<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neil Krey's Waypoints</title>
	<link>http://waypoints.magentaline.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts while following the MagentaLine</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Too Big to Fix</title>
		<link>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2008/11/24/too-big-to-fix/</link>
		<comments>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2008/11/24/too-big-to-fix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neilkrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2008/11/24/too-big-to-fix/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The media is full of discussion about huge organizations that are being bailed out with taxpayer money because they are &#8220;too big to fail&#8221;.  According to the arguments, letting a General Motors, a CitiGroup, or any of dozens of other compnies fail would result in unacceptable consequences in terms of the economy and job losses.
What [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media is full of discussion about huge organizations that are being bailed out with taxpayer money because they are &#8220;too big to fail&#8221;.  According to the arguments, letting a General Motors, a CitiGroup, or any of dozens of other compnies fail would result in unacceptable consequences in terms of the economy and job losses.</p>
<p>What I wish someone would talk about is whether these mega-corporations are really too big to <strong>fix</strong>.  Rather than putting them on public life support, would it be better to let them slip away into history?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2008/11/24/too-big-to-fix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Complexity</title>
		<link>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2008/11/05/complexity/</link>
		<comments>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2008/11/05/complexity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neilkrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SRM/CRM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2008/11/05/complexity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My wife and I each have our own alarm clock.  Hers is a traditional analog type with the little pointer that indicates what time the alarm will go off.  Mine is a fancy digital clock radio that has two different alarm times and lets you choose either an alarm tone or the radio.
If she is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife and I each have our own alarm clock.  Hers is a traditional analog type with the little pointer that indicates what time the alarm will go off.  Mine is a fancy digital clock radio that has two different alarm times and lets you choose either an alarm tone or the radio.</p>
<p>If she is in a hurry to set the alarm, it can be as much as 15 minutes early or late.  If I am in a hurry, I am likely to get a very precise 12 hour error.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><em>&#8220;Fools ignore complexity. Pragmatists suffer it. Some can avoid it. Geniuses remove it.&#8221; - </em>Alan Perlis, Computer Scientist</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>There is no question that my alarm is the more complex of the two, so I suppose it is no surprise that it would be more prone to operator error.  This relationship is found in our cockpits as well.  Avionics have made a huge jump in capability, and complexity, over the last decade.  I often instruct in aircraft equipped with the Garmin G1000 and Avidyne Entegra glass cockpit systems.  While I feel I am very proficient in their use, I still learn new things about them from time to time.  And you customers have to work hard to learn to take advantage of everything these systems can do.  <a href="http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2008/11/05/complexity/#more-12" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2008/11/05/complexity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WASS Up?</title>
		<link>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2008/10/09/wass-up/</link>
		<comments>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2008/10/09/wass-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neilkrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General Aviation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2008/10/09/wass-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The flight school where I work part time as Assistant Chief Flight Instructor added a new Cessna 172 to its training fleet recently.  Like two others we operate, it is equipped with the Garmin G1000 integrated cockpit system.  Unlike the others, this airplane is also WAAS equipped.  WAAS (Wide Area Augmentation System) adds to the precision [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 6pt 0in" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">The <a target="_blank" href="http://www.marcairaviation.com" title="Marcair Aviation">flight school</a> where I work part time as Assistant Chief Flight Instructor added a new Cessna 172 to its training fleet recently.<span>  </span>Like two others we operate, it is equipped with the Garmin G1000 integrated cockpit system.<span>  </span>Unlike the others, this airplane is also <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide_Area_Augmentation_System" title="WAAS">WAAS</a> equipped.<span>  </span>WAAS (Wide Area Augmentation System) adds to the precision of the GPS navigation system by adding a signal broadcast from the ground.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 6pt 0in" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">In many ways, the addition of WAAS is a subtle change.<span>  </span>There is no WAAS switch and no WAAS light to tell you it is working.<span>  </span>It does, however, add some very useful capabilities.<span>  </span>Among these are the ability to navigate vertically as well as horizontally.<span>  </span>The system will provide guidance during descents in cruise and on instrument approaches.<span>  </span>The glide path it displays looks and works very much like the glide slope for an ILS approach.<span>  </span>There is also a general upgrade in the accuracy of lateral guidance over GPS-only equipment. </font></p>
<p style="margin: 6pt 0in" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">The primary benefit of WAAS lies in its ability to provide accurate vertical guidance.<span>  </span>So many accidents result from the pilots’ lack of awareness of where the airplane is relative to a safe descent path.<span>  </span>The WAAS system, properly used, can help to fill that gap.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 6pt 0in" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">WAAS capability comes with a price, however, and that is additional complexity.<span>  </span>To fully take advantage of its capabilities requires additional programming and an enhance knowledge of the modes of operation and displays.<span>  </span>Autopilots designed to take advantage of WASS also have more features, and therefore a steeper learning curve.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 6pt 0in" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Like so many technological innovations over the past several years, WAAS requires a bit of training before the pilot can really take advantage of it.<span>  </span>This is yet another reason to be sure you spend some quality time with your instructor to receive personalized training on the equipment you use.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2008/10/09/wass-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New FAA Publications</title>
		<link>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/11/24/new-faa-publications/</link>
		<comments>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/11/24/new-faa-publications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neilkrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General Aviation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/11/24/new-faa-publications/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of us think of FAA publications as being stuffy and out of date, but there have been a number made available recently that could change your mind.
The newest revision of the &#8220;Instrument Flying Handbook&#8221; includes material on basic instrument flying using the new generation of glass cockpit instrumentation. This book is a companion to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of us think of FAA publications as being stuffy and out of date, but there have been a number made available recently that could change your mind.</p>
<p>The newest revision of the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/aviation/instrument_flying_handbook/">&#8220;Instrument Flying Handbook&#8221;</a> includes material on basic instrument flying using the new generation of glass cockpit instrumentation. This book is a companion to the <a href="http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/aviation/instrument_procedures_handbook/" target="_blank">&#8220;Instrument Procedures Handbook&#8221; </a>, which was also revised this year to update information on GPS, RNAV, and RNP procedures. Together, these are excellent resources for any instrument pilot.</p>
<p>Until recently, FAA guidance on the conduct of an Instrument Proficiency Check (IPC) was vague and out of date. In August 2007, however, FAA released <a href="http://www.faa.gov/pilots/training/media/IPC_Guidance.pdf" target="_blank">“Instrument Proficiency Check (IPC) Guidance” </a>, a document that gives instrument instructors and pilots helpful hints on how to prepare for and conduct the IPC. Complementing the IPC book is <a target="_blank" href="https://www.faasafety.gov/files/gslac/library/documents/2006/Oct/10227/Conducting%20an%20Effective%20Flight%20Review%20Aug06.pdf">“Conducting an Effective Flight Review”</a>. Together, these two books provide solid recurrent training guidance for just about any instructor or pilot.</p>
<p>Another excellent resource is last year’s <a target="_blank" href="https://www.faasafety.gov/files/gslac/library/documents/2006/Oct/9724/GA%20Weather%20Decision-Making%20Aug06.pdf">&#8220;General Aviation Pilot’s Guide to Preflight Weather Planning, Weather Self-Briefings, and Weather Decision Making&#8221;</a>. This provides excellent tips on weather strategy and tactics.</p>
<p>Finally, FAA has been promoting the use of scenario-based training for the last few years. A clear and understandable guide to this training technique is found in <a target="_blank" href="https://www.faasafety.gov/files/gslac/library/documents/2007/Sep/19529/Introduction%20to%20Scenario-Based%20Training.pdf">“Introduction to Scenario-Based Training&#8221;</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/11/24/new-faa-publications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep the Change</title>
		<link>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/09/09/keep-the-change/</link>
		<comments>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/09/09/keep-the-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 18:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neilkrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General Aviation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/09/09/keep-the-change/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you probably know, a debate is raging about how to change the way we fund the FAA. The airlines are promoting a plan that relieves them of most fees and charges – passing them on to their passengers and to general aviation.
Represented by their industry group, the Air Transport Association, they are lobbying for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you probably know, a debate is raging about how to change the way we fund the FAA. The airlines are promoting a plan that relieves them of most fees and charges – passing them on to their passengers and to general aviation.</p>
<p>Represented by their industry group, the Air Transport Association, they are lobbying for yet another round of cost cuts. In the recent past, they have robbed their employees, vendors, and stockholders in their efforts to reduce costs to match their artificially low prices. Now they are casting business jets as the bad guys – responsible for delays and all manner of ills that cost the airlines money. The balance sheet, of course, is the issue. The airlines don’t seem to consider their lack of ability to provide good service to their customers a problem.</p>
<p>I’m sure it is no secret that I don’t hold the airlines in particularly high regard. For decades they have proven they are unable to solve the most fundamental equation of business: Profit equals price minus cost. The number of airlines that have failed, or have passed through bankruptcy, is astounding. <a href="http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/09/09/keep-the-change/#more-9" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/09/09/keep-the-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Reasons GA is Better than the Airlines</title>
		<link>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/03/07/top-10-reasons-ga-is-better-than-the-airlines/</link>
		<comments>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/03/07/top-10-reasons-ga-is-better-than-the-airlines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neilkrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General Aviation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/03/07/top-10-reasons-ga-is-better-than-the-airlines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Airline travel has become progressively more unpleasant, which is helping boost the market for private and business aircraft.  Here is my list of the top ten reasons the airlines have become the second choice to general aviation (GA) for air travel.

You don’t have to stay on the airplane for 8 hours when you divert.
You don’t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Airline travel has become progressively more unpleasant, which is helping boost the market for private and business aircraft.  Here is my list of the top ten reasons the airlines have become the second choice to general aviation (GA) for air travel.</font></p>
<ol style="margin-top: 0in" type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">You don’t have to stay on the airplane for 8 hours when you divert.</font></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">You don’t get treated like a terrorist upon arrival at the airport.</font></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">You get to pick who you sit next to.</font></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">The weather in New York doesn’t make your flight from Dallas to Phoenix late.</font></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Some guy in a golf cart doesn’t yell at you to get out of his way in the terminal.</font></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">There is never another plane at your gate when you arrive early.</font></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">You don’t have to wait for your luggage, and it NEVER gets lost.</font></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Your airplane will not go bankrupt an hour before you get to the airport.</font></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">You don’t have to wait for the crew to arrive from Cleveland.</font></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">You don’t arrive with 5 minutes to change planes while sitting in seat 36A.</font></li>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3" /></ol>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">And the bonus reason:</font><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3" /><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3" /></font></font></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3" /></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><strong>Every seat is a window seat!</strong></font></p>
</blockquote>
<p></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/03/07/top-10-reasons-ga-is-better-than-the-airlines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Trouble with Trouble</title>
		<link>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/02/17/the-trouble-with-trouble/</link>
		<comments>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/02/17/the-trouble-with-trouble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neilkrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SRM/CRM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/02/17/the-trouble-with-trouble/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the difficulties, and attractions, of flying is how easy it is to get into trouble.  And, once in trouble, how hard it can be to get out.  For as long as man has ventured into the air, we have devised gadgets intended to keep us safe.
One of the newer ones is the “whole [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">One of the difficulties, and attractions, of flying is how easy it is to get into trouble.  And, once in trouble, how hard it can be to get out.  For as long as man has ventured into the air, we have devised gadgets intended to keep us safe.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><img id="image6" title="BRS Parachute" alt="BRS Parachute" hspace="5" src="http://waypoints.magentaline.com/__oneclick_uploads/2007/02/brs333.thumbnail.jpg" align="left" />One of the newer ones is the “whole aircraft parachute” system.  Such systems float the entire airplane down to the ground, and have been adopted widely in the ultralight community.  Under the name of CAPS (Cirrus Airframe Parachute System), this equipment is installed on every Cirrus Design product.</font></font></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">  </font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">These systems are credited with saving numerous lives, but are still the object of passionate debate in airport lounges and online forums.  Folks either love them or hate them.   <a href="http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/02/17/the-trouble-with-trouble/#more-7" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/02/17/the-trouble-with-trouble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wind Your Watch</title>
		<link>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/02/10/wind-your-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/02/10/wind-your-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 14:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neilkrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SRM/CRM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/02/10/wind-your-watch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the ‘80s, I was part of the team that started SimuFlite – at the time the largest startup in dollar terms in aviation history.  Besides seeing how a new business is born from the inside, I had the opportunity to give simulator instruction to some of the best business aviation crews in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Back in the ‘80s, I was part of the team that started SimuFlite – at the time the largest startup in dollar terms in aviation history.  Besides seeing how a new business is born from the inside, I had the opportunity to give simulator instruction to some of the best business aviation crews in the industry.  I spent many hours in the Learjet 35/36 and King Air 200 simulators running training scenarios that taught, tested, and sometimes humbled the pilots.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">One session I remember vividly involved a Learjet crew who were very sharp – and quick.  They had handled every emergency the lesson plans called for with accuracy and blinding speed.  They always took the correct action, and often completed the emergency checklists from memory.  It was too good to be true.  <a href="http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/02/10/wind-your-watch/#more-5" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/02/10/wind-your-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Word Allergies</title>
		<link>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/02/03/word-allergies/</link>
		<comments>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/02/03/word-allergies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 14:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neilkrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SRM/CRM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/02/03/word-allergies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My years in the aviation industry have been evenly split between time in the cockpit and time behind a desk – over 15 years of each.  In my desk-life, I have worked in management for some of the most successful companies in aviation – SimuFlite, FlightSafety International, Bombardier, Raytheon, Hughes Aircraft, and General Dynamics.  I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">My years in the aviation industry have been evenly split between time in the cockpit and time behind a desk – over 15 years of each.  In my desk-life, I have worked in management for some of the most successful companies in aviation – SimuFlite, FlightSafety International, Bombardier, Raytheon, Hughes Aircraft, and General Dynamics.  I not only learned a lot about being a pilot, I learned about business.  What I have learned makes me believe that sometimes they are not compatible.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Imagine, for example, sitting in a business meeting with your boss and coworkers.  The boss asks if the project you are responsible for will be finished on time.  If you answer “No”, the results are not likely to be pleasant.  The same is true if you say “You will have to wait.”  It seems that in our results-oriented business world, you need to develop an allergy to words such as “no” and “wait”.  <a href="http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/02/03/word-allergies/#more-4" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/02/03/word-allergies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When the Going Gets Weird&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/01/22/when-the-going-get-weird/</link>
		<comments>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/01/22/when-the-going-get-weird/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neilkrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SRM/CRM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/01/22/when-the-going-get-weird/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The media recently reported the 25th anniversary of the Air Florida accident in a snow storm at Washington, D.C. in 1982.  These reports touted the “sweeping legacy” of this accident and the safety improvements that it spawned.
This accident remains fresh in my mind, partly because I watched the live reports on the then-new CNN as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">The media recently reported the 25th anniversary of the Air Florida accident in a snow storm at Washington, D.C. in 1982.  These reports touted the “sweeping legacy” of this accident and the safety improvements that it spawned.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">This accident remains fresh in my mind, partly because I watched the live reports on the then-new CNN as survivors and wreckage were pulled from the icy Potomac River, partly because I used this accident as a case study in Crew Resource Management (CRM) classes in the years since.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">As with all accidents, there was a chain of events that led to the end of 73 lives.  As with most accidents, the crew had several chances to break the chain of events and avoid the accident.  Their last opportunity was as they began the takeoff on KDCA’s runway 36. <a href="http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/01/22/when-the-going-get-weird/#more-3" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://waypoints.magentaline.com/2007/01/22/when-the-going-get-weird/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
